- Posts: 4
- Thank you received: 2
Differences in CD kits, CDH and CDS
- jayne.bushway
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
05 Aug 2020 12:59 - 05 Aug 2020 13:00 #65487
by jayne.bushway
Differences in CD kits, CDH and CDS was created by jayne.bushway
I am new here. I have seen different products offered, the CD kits with sodium chlorite and an acid activator, CDH and CDS. My question is which is the best to take? Will they all give the same results in the end? I am having a hard time with the citrus acid activator and cannot take that. It is very harsh especially since I have GERD. I've also read that the MMS can be mixed with DMSO and put on the skin and absorbed that way, basically bypassing the stomach.
Thank you in advance for any information offered.
Thank you in advance for any information offered.
Last edit: 05 Aug 2020 13:00 by jayne.bushway. Reason: added more text
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- CLO2
-
- Offline
- Administrator
-
05 Aug 2020 22:00 - 05 Aug 2020 22:04 #65491
by CLO2
Replied by CLO2 on topic Differences in CD kits, CDH and CDS
Hello Jayne.
Which sodium chlorite solution (SCS) is best? Since all three, MMS1, CDS and CDH are made from the same two ingredients (MMS and 4% HCL) you would think they would all be useful, and they are.
By the way, 50% citric acid is no longer used to make any of the SCS. It seems the sellers have not yet gotten the message. When I try to talk to them about this and other topics, they ignore me. Whatever...
There are differences between the three SCS, however.
When MMS is activated with 4% HCL, releasing chlorine dioxide gas, this is what you get:
>> MMS1 is 10% activated and therefore has large amounts of residual MMS and some acid.
>> CDH is 50% activated and therefore has some amount of residual MMS and maybe some acid.
>> CDS is 100% chlorine dioxide gas (CLO2) in water and does not have any residual MMS or acid.
The residual MMS in both MMS1 and CDH should be further activated in stomach acid (HCL) when ingested.
So, it seems that MMS1 and CDH may be the best SCS for ingestion, because they were designed to allow additional stomach acid activation.
That is not the case with CDS. You can ingest CDS up to the point where mouth and throat irritation can become a problem, because of the high levels of CLO2. But, you can use CDS for ingestion and get additional CLO2 if you add some unactivated MMS to CDS doses. The added MMS should activate in stomach acid just like residual MMS should in MMS1 and CDH doses. See Protocol 102 at www.mmsinfo.org/
In my opinion, CDS is the best SCS for topical use, enema & douche, injection, baths, teeth brushing, etc.
So, I always start with CDS and then add MMS if needed. An advantage to making CDS is I only need to buy MMS (or flakes and make MMS) online. HCL activator is available everywhere at your local hardware store. I buy inexpensive muriatic acid and dilute it down to 4%. It is not clean HCL, but it does not end up in CDS; only CLO2 gas is in CDS. When making MMS1 and CDH you do need clean HCL because it will be in the doses you ingest.
Basically what I am doing is starting with CDS and then adding MMS to make MMS1 or CDH if needed. I can now make CDS in as little as one hour using a modified 'shot glass' method. This new method can make a one-day supply of CDS which will not need to refrigerated.
Yes, you can apply a SCS topically followed by DMSO. The protocol is called Protocol 3000 and the patch protocol. You could also use the bag method. All those protocols are listed in Jim Humble's latest book, MMS Health Recovery Guidebook.
Which sodium chlorite solution (SCS) is best? Since all three, MMS1, CDS and CDH are made from the same two ingredients (MMS and 4% HCL) you would think they would all be useful, and they are.
By the way, 50% citric acid is no longer used to make any of the SCS. It seems the sellers have not yet gotten the message. When I try to talk to them about this and other topics, they ignore me. Whatever...
There are differences between the three SCS, however.
When MMS is activated with 4% HCL, releasing chlorine dioxide gas, this is what you get:
>> MMS1 is 10% activated and therefore has large amounts of residual MMS and some acid.
>> CDH is 50% activated and therefore has some amount of residual MMS and maybe some acid.
>> CDS is 100% chlorine dioxide gas (CLO2) in water and does not have any residual MMS or acid.
The residual MMS in both MMS1 and CDH should be further activated in stomach acid (HCL) when ingested.
So, it seems that MMS1 and CDH may be the best SCS for ingestion, because they were designed to allow additional stomach acid activation.
That is not the case with CDS. You can ingest CDS up to the point where mouth and throat irritation can become a problem, because of the high levels of CLO2. But, you can use CDS for ingestion and get additional CLO2 if you add some unactivated MMS to CDS doses. The added MMS should activate in stomach acid just like residual MMS should in MMS1 and CDH doses. See Protocol 102 at www.mmsinfo.org/
In my opinion, CDS is the best SCS for topical use, enema & douche, injection, baths, teeth brushing, etc.
So, I always start with CDS and then add MMS if needed. An advantage to making CDS is I only need to buy MMS (or flakes and make MMS) online. HCL activator is available everywhere at your local hardware store. I buy inexpensive muriatic acid and dilute it down to 4%. It is not clean HCL, but it does not end up in CDS; only CLO2 gas is in CDS. When making MMS1 and CDH you do need clean HCL because it will be in the doses you ingest.
Basically what I am doing is starting with CDS and then adding MMS to make MMS1 or CDH if needed. I can now make CDS in as little as one hour using a modified 'shot glass' method. This new method can make a one-day supply of CDS which will not need to refrigerated.
Yes, you can apply a SCS topically followed by DMSO. The protocol is called Protocol 3000 and the patch protocol. You could also use the bag method. All those protocols are listed in Jim Humble's latest book, MMS Health Recovery Guidebook.
Last edit: 05 Aug 2020 22:04 by CLO2.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Truthquester, Tiki, jayne.bushway
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Truthquester
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
06 Aug 2020 06:13 - 06 Aug 2020 06:14 #65497
by Truthquester
I'm Scott McRae, creator of "The Antidote" & CDH with CLO2's help (Charlotte Lackney)
- I did a CDH injection / Chlorine Dioxide (CLO2) injection / IV push of 10ml of dilute 50ppm CDH / CLO2 into my blood 3 times in 11 hours & did before & after blood tests that showed that it did NO HARM to my blood, liver or kidneys. This suggests the possibility that CDH / CLO2 is a potential LIFESAVING MRSA cure, VRE cure, CRE cure, AMR cure, Ebola cure, HIV cure, Cancer cure, etc., since it appears to be safe intravenously at 50ppm.
- Join our group on MiWi (was deleted off of Facebook): mewe.com/join/coronavirusebolasolutions
- Every ml of CDH contains 1 drop of MMS, so 1 drop of MMS = 1ml of CDH
- MMS is 7 to 10% activated in 30 seconds while CDH made with 4% HCl is about 50% activated in the bottle. This is why CDH is far less nauseating than MMS drops
Replied by Truthquester on topic Differences in CD kits, CDH and CDS
My 2 cents: I like CDH better because the residual ingredients also have anti-pathogen properties, stay in the body longer and may be what's required to fight off whatever infection is being treated. Even the residual HCl can help to fight infection. It's also easier to make than CDS and much easier to make extremely large quantities - for example I could easily make a whole 350 liter drum of CDH in just 24 hours by combining 3 ingredients.
Also, I have injected CDH myself a number of times and have never had ANY kind of adverse reaction. So, as far as I'm concerned, the residual ingredients are not toxic to the body at the low dosing required for just about any infection.
All the forms of MMS are good though and will work against many diseases. But like CLO2 said, I would stay away from the citric acid as an activator if possible.
All the best,
Scott
Also, I have injected CDH myself a number of times and have never had ANY kind of adverse reaction. So, as far as I'm concerned, the residual ingredients are not toxic to the body at the low dosing required for just about any infection.
All the forms of MMS are good though and will work against many diseases. But like CLO2 said, I would stay away from the citric acid as an activator if possible.
All the best,
Scott
I'm Scott McRae, creator of "The Antidote" & CDH with CLO2's help (Charlotte Lackney)
- I did a CDH injection / Chlorine Dioxide (CLO2) injection / IV push of 10ml of dilute 50ppm CDH / CLO2 into my blood 3 times in 11 hours & did before & after blood tests that showed that it did NO HARM to my blood, liver or kidneys. This suggests the possibility that CDH / CLO2 is a potential LIFESAVING MRSA cure, VRE cure, CRE cure, AMR cure, Ebola cure, HIV cure, Cancer cure, etc., since it appears to be safe intravenously at 50ppm.
- Join our group on MiWi (was deleted off of Facebook): mewe.com/join/coronavirusebolasolutions
- Every ml of CDH contains 1 drop of MMS, so 1 drop of MMS = 1ml of CDH
- MMS is 7 to 10% activated in 30 seconds while CDH made with 4% HCl is about 50% activated in the bottle. This is why CDH is far less nauseating than MMS drops
Last edit: 06 Aug 2020 06:14 by Truthquester.
The following user(s) said Thank You: CLO2, jayne.bushway
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Tiki
-
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 16
- Thank you received: 7
11 Aug 2020 15:01 #65537
by Tiki
Replied by Tiki on topic Differences in CD kits, CDH and CDS
Hi CLO2,
Can you provide a link to the modified “shot glass” method?
Thank you!
Can you provide a link to the modified “shot glass” method?
Thank you!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- CLO2
-
- Offline
- Administrator
-
11 Aug 2020 18:08 #65541
by CLO2
Replied by CLO2 on topic Differences in CD kits, CDH and CDS
Tiki, the modified shot-glass method of making CDS is an ongoing project. I have been testing for about 2 months and am getting closer to publishing the results. If you go to
mmsinfo.org
and "Ask a Question" I will reply via email and give you some info.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Tiki
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.558 seconds