A good way to produce chlorine dioxide. And a bad way to produce chlorine dioxide. Truth or lie?

Salute to all residents of the forum!

I ask knowledgeable people to comment on the information that I will present below.
Maybe Jim will want to say on this subject?

There www.dutrion.com/about-chlorine-dioxide/ written:

"The pungent smell of chlorine can therefore not be detected in the water when using chlorine dioxide."

And in this article (it is in Russian, so use a web translator) dutrion.com.ua/article/ASC.htm says that there are different ways of producing chlorine dioxide.
One way is to output 99% chlorine dioxide and the other 10-15% + side effect of emission of harmful substances.
I understand that all users are aware MMS close the way that the article described as "bad."

Are we really to sniff and drink chloro ???


I think that if there is written is true, then we should use more clean technology to produce chlorine dioxide.

But I also understand that it might be a trick of the supplier in order to dissociate itself from the competition and put your product in the best light, thus worsen the attitude of consumers to other suppliers.

But what if they do not have a chlorine smell ???

Here is a link to another official product www.aquaprove.com/why-aquaprove/