CDH: Intravenous injection of dilute CDH to cure infections of the blood appears to be safe and very effective

CHRISSTINIS: I am hesitant to add MMS2 because she takes a number of other things like B17 tablets, DIM capsules, tablets for osteoporosis and God knows what else.

Scott: will do, easy enough although not sure if the sodium chlorite won't get neutralized by the other supplements she is taking.

Thanks for all the suggestions, will keep you updated.

Dear gabyher,
The Amygdalin is a substance that can have powerful antioxidant activity and gathered mostly near tumors, so it can neutralize rapidly even and the intravenous cdh. Before two years, I developed some strange movement in the end of my right lung which mms1 could not help and so I stepped only in raw apricots. I was taking gradually starting with 30 pieces the day to maximum 80 - 100 pieces and when I took the maximum dosage the problem disappeared in 5 days, but I know that is a powerful antioxidant, which concentrated near the newborn tumors. I think that she must cut this supplement so that to become more effective the injections.

For those who are interested, the treating of a cancerous tumor by injecting CDH at about 200ppm into it can be found in the following post here on the forum which talks about a US Patent which discussed doing the same thing: mmsforum.io/goto/cancers/32177-patent-us10105389b1-method-compositions-for-treating-cancerous-tumors-text?start=0

All the best,
Scott

Hi Gabyher,
Just a quick question about your intravenous injections that you did for your friend (into the vein, not into the tumor). Why did you guys decide to use such high ppm? I estimate that you used about 1,166 ppm and 2,333 ppm while I think the highest I have ever talked about using was 100 ppm. My reason for thinking 100 ppm is as high as I would want to go is because I've brushed my teeth with different concentrations, exposing the mucus membrane of my mouth to chlorine dioxide up to about 200 ppm I think, but I could feel that at that strength, my mucus membrane was suffering while at around 100 ppm it was much better and at 50 ppm there's almost no irritation at all. So I applied my personal experience to what I've felt in my mouth to my veins, thinking that they are somewhat similar. Also, Dr. Rowen has talked about how H2O2 (hydrogen peroxide) can be hard on the veins when doing intravenous with it. Ozone too I think. So I'm just curious why you went so high. It appears that you didn't have any problems with it that high so that's great, but I'd still like to know your thinking on that.

Thanks,
Scott McRae

Hi Scott:
I know that's too high a ppm close to unsafe dose; she wanted to get results as fast as possible so wanted the highest ppm despite being on the border line of safety. If I had to do it again I would not go that high ever again. 100ppm would be my maximum. So it was not done out of experience or knowledge, but out of craziness if you will. We decided to give the IV a rest and concentrate on the tumor. No action lately, we'll keep you updated.

gabyher wrote: Hi Scott:
I know that's too high a ppm close to unsafe dose; she wanted to get results as fast as possible so wanted the highest ppm despite being on the border line of safety. If I had to do it again I would not go that high ever again. 100ppm would be my maximum. So it was not done out of experience or knowledge, but out of craziness if you will. We decided to give the IV a rest and concentrate on the tumor. No action lately, we'll keep you updated.

Thanks for clarifying that Gabyher. I wouldn't want people here thinking that those were normal or even suggested concentrations to use for IV injection. It's important that people realize that based on the studies that I will attach below, even CLO2 concentrations as low as 10 ppm will do the job in just 15 seconds to either kill or greatly reduce all bacteria and viruses. Unfortunately the studies don't then simply double the concentration to see what happens at 20 ppm, or go 5 times higher to 50 ppm. If they would have, I'm pretty sure they would have shown something similar to what happens at 100 ppm which was the next higher concentration they jumped to after 10 ppm. At 100 ppm CLO2 basically obliterates all bacteria and viruses. Of course we're talking about injecting into the blood stream though and the blood is going to have an extremely strong neutralizing effect on the CLO2 also, so that too must be taken into account and so that's why I feel for myself anyway, 50 to 100 ppm is as high as I would want to go. In my mind 50 ppm should be pretty mild to the veins (again, based on my experience in how it effects my mucus membrane when I brush my teeth at that concentration) and yet still effective at neutralizing or killing viruses and bacteria in the blood.

Last, I can always increase the amount of 50 to 100 ppm CLO2 that I do intravenously. I'm not limited to just doing 10 ml or even 100 ml. I could do a slow drip of 500 ml if I wanted to get a very large amount into my blood. To give an idea of how much more that is quantitatively, we can just multiply the parts per million by the number of ml going into our blood like this:

50 ppm X 10 ml = 500
50 ppm X 100 ml = 5000
50 ppm X 500 ml = 25,000
or
100 ppm X 10 ml = 1,000
100 ppm X 100 ml = 10,000
100 ppm X 500 ml = 50,000

At a slow drip and at these lower ppm, I believe I would do little to no harm to my veins.

I know of someone who did 325 ml of 122 ppm (122 ppm X 325 ml = 39,650) and this did lower his hemoglobin but not enough to be a danger. After this happens the body will quickly regenerate more hemoglobin and bring it back up to normal levels, so the way I see it, it's worth it to do this in order to fight a disease such as Ebola for example, or any life threatening blood infection.

Please click the attachment links below in the lower left to see the studies I mentioned above. For some browsers that's the only way the links will open.

Thanks again Gabyher.

May we all be well,
Scott McRae
PS. This forum is not allowing me to attach the studies on this post for some reason so I'll just put the links and names of the studies below and hopefully you can see them or search for them online and find them. Here are the names of the studies and their links:

Study Name:
Evaluation of the Antiviral Activity of Chlorine Dioxide and Sodium Hypochlorite against Feline Calicivirus, Human Influenza Virus, Measles Virus, Canine Distemper Virus, Human Herpesvirus, Human Adenovirus, Canine Adenovirus and Canine Parvovirus
Study Link:
www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/bio/15/2/15_2_45/_pdf/-char/en

Study Name:
Chlorine dioxide is a superior disinfectant against multi-drug resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii
Study Link: www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/yoken/advpub/0/advpub_JJID.2014.294/_pdf/-char/en

Hi Scott:
Thanks for emphasizing the max concentration that one should not go beyond.

gabyher wrote: Hi Scott:
Thanks for emphasizing the max concentration that one should not go beyond.

Gabyher to be perfectly honest I can't say what the max concentration is because I really don't know what it is myself for sure. I'm just making an educated guess about what I think it might be based on my own experience and some studies and patents. We do know too much of anything can be bad for us and that goes for CLO2 as well, so I do think we should error on the side of caution if possible. Wouldn't it be great if we had a team of ethical medical experts really trying to zero in on all of this so we knew for sure how much to use for this or that medical condition? Alas, it's just us though. So we take from our own experiences, studies, patents and other similar products like H2O2 and Ozone, to try to figure it all out. This is why I so appreciate your reporting very accurately what you've done so far. It's gold for the miners of this kind of information here.

Thanks again and looking forward to hearing your next report.
Scott McRae

UPDATE:
TUESDAY Oct 15
Before injecting I tried to feel the size of the lump. I would say 40% reduction; the depth is noticeably reduced.
She has been massaging the breast with the castor oil/DMSO solution and drinking 3 drops of unactivated MMS everyday.
Injection in breast: in 2 locations close to the 'eye' for a total of ~0.6ml. What surprised me today is that she suffered much less during injection and her recovery time was like 4/5 minutes compared to 10/15mnts last week.
The progress is encouraging.

Hi Gabyher - great news that the tumor has continued to shrink down to about 40% now!
3 quick questions; Since your last injection report was dated Tuesday, October 8th, did you take a break of a week or continue doing the injections daily as you had been doing? And regarding the 3 drops of unactivated MMS she's taking, is she putting the 3 drops in a liter of water and then drinking from that throughout the day and if so, is a liter of water all she drinks in a day?

Thanks,
Scott